Translate

lunedì 26 ottobre 2015

POLARIZATION: A KEY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAN-MADE AND NATURAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS, IN REGARD TO BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY

Nuova pubblicazione scientifica di Olle Johansson, noto ricercatore svedese dell’Istituto Karolinska insieme a Dr. Dimitris J. Panagopoulos e Dr. George L. Carlo, che conferma quanto viene ribadito da anni ; ovvero che è la polarizzazione causata dalla pulsazione dei campi elettromagnetici artificiali a creare i danni biologici e non la densità di potenza  ( Se ne era parlato anche al Convegno Internazionale di Potenza Picena del 2013 ).
---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos1,2,3, Olle Johansson4, George L. Carlo5

1 National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
2 Department of Biology, University of Athens, Greece.
3 Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Research Centre, Greece. (D.J.P)
4 Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. (O.J.)
5 The Science and Public Policy Institute, Institute for Healthful Adaptation, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. (G.L.C.)

Solar electromagnetic radiation incident upon a human body is normally more than ten times stronger than corresponding radiation from a digital mobile phone handset upon a human head during “talk” emission. Similarly, infrared radiation from every human body at normal temperature has significantly larger incident intensity, and exposure duration on any human than most artificial electromagnetic field (EMF) sources. Why is then the first beneficial while the latter seem to be detrimental? In the present study we show that the increased adverse biological action of man-made EMFs is due to the fact that they are all polarized in contrast to all natural ones which are not. Polarization is thus a parameter of utmost importance, largely underestimated - up to today - in the EMF-bioeffects literature, and not taken into account in the existing exposure criteria.
The present study in combination with the “Ion Forced-Oscillation theory” (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X02023938) shows that environmentally accounted EMF intensities from power lines or mobile phone antennas are strong enough to potentially disrupt the function of any living cell/organism. Therefore, “lack of mechanism” is not the case anymore.

Leggi QUI la pubblicazione ( in inglese )

    FONTE : NATURE.COM