il 22 settembre è il giorno dedicato ai problemi della fertilità che ha la
nostra società, ma invece di parlare di età e di tutte le polemiche annesse
sarebbe bello che si incominciasse a considerare le ricerche scientifiche che
da anni stanno analizzando questo problema . ( vedi http://www.fertilityday2016.it/ )
Qui sotto trovate un’importante Review condotta da ricercatori australiani
che valuta gli effetti delle radiofrequenze emesse dalla telefonia mobile sulla
fertilità maschile.
Su
27 studi presi in considerazione ben 21 riportano chiaramente una correlazione
tra esposizione e danno significativo agli spermatozoi.
Cosa
ancora più interessante è la dimostrazione di un meccanismo di azione in grado
di indurre danno mitocondriale ( lo stesso che si verifica a livello cerebrale
con chiaro danno a carico neuronale).
(
Analisi fatta dal dott. P.Orio vice presidente Ass. Elettrosensibii )
Pubblicato
il 6.9.2016 su The Journal of the Society for Reproduction and Fertility
-----o-----o-----o-----o-----o-----o-----o-----o-----o-----
REPRODUCTION
ADVANCE PUBLICATION FIRST POSTED ONLINE ON 6 SEPTEMBER 2016)
·
REVIEW
THE EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON SPERM FUNCTION
Author
Author Affiliations
B Houston,
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle,
Callaghan, 2308, Australia
R Aitken,
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle,
Callaghan, 2308, Australia
Correspondence:
Brendan Houston, Email: brendan.houston@uon.edu.au
ABSTRACT
Mobile phone
usage has become an integral part of our lives. However, the effects of the
radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by these devices on
biological systems and specifically the reproductive systems are currently
under active debate. A fundamental hindrance to the current debate is that
there is no clear mechanism of how such non-ionising radiation influences
biological systems. Therefore, we explored the documented impacts of RF-EMR on
the male reproductive system and considered any common observations that could
provide insights on a potential mechanism. Among a total of 27 studies
investigating the effects of RF-EMR on the male reproductive system, negative
consequences of exposure were reported in 21. Within these 21 studies, 11 of
the 15 that investigated sperm motility reported significant declines, 7 of 7
that measured the production of reactive oxygen species documented elevated
levels and 4 of 5 studies that probed for DNA damage highlighted increased
damage, due to RF-EMR exposure. Associated with this, RF-EMR treatment reduced
antioxidant levels in 6 of 6 studies that studied this phenomenon, while
consequences of RF-EMR were successfully ameliorated with the supplementation
of antioxidants in all 3 studies that carried out these experiments. In light
of this, we envisage a two-step mechanism whereby RF-EMR is able to induce
mitochondrial dysfunction leading to elevated ROS production. A continued focus
on research which aims to shed light on the biological effects of RF-EMR will
allow us to test and assess this proposed mechanism in a variety of cell types.