Senza fare allarmismi
( che alimentano i qualunquisti ) ecco una metanalisi che correla con
significatività statistica con un aumento del rischio del 38%, l'utilizzo del
telefono cellulare ( campi elettromagnetici in alta frequenza ) e l'insorgenza
di tumori alle ghiandole salivari.
---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---
DOES CELL PHONE USE INCREASE THE CHANCES OF PAROTID
GLAND TUMOR DEVELOPMENT? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
de Siqueira EC1, de Souza FT2, Gomez RS2, Gomes CC1, de Souza RP3.
- 1Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais- UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
- 2Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais- UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
- 3Grupo de Pesquisa em Bioestatística e Epidemiologia Molecular, Department of General Biology, Biological Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais- UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Prior epidemiological studies had examined the
association between cell phone use and the development of tumors in the parotid
glands. However there is no consensus about the question of whether cell phone
use is associated with increased risk of tumors in the parotid glands. We
performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the existing literature about the mean
question and to determine their statistical significance.
METHODS:
Primary association studies. Papers that associated
cell phone use and parotid gland tumors development were included, with no
restrictions regarding publication date, language and place of publication.
Systematic literature search using PubMed, Scielo and Embase followed by
meta-analysis.
RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION:
Initial screening included 37 articles and three were
included in meta-analysis. Using three independent samples including 5087
subjects from retrospective case-control studies, cell phone use seems to be
associated with greater odds (1.28, 95%- confidence interval 1.09 - 1.51) to
develop salivary gland tumor. Results should be read with caution due to the
limited number of studies available and their retrospective design. This
article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.